Message611

Author pcalhoun
Recipients
Date 2008-10-09.21:25:09
Content
> Fair enough, and I see that we were not very specific in this regard. 
> I believe the text should read:
>
> <proposed text>
>    CAPWAP implementations MUST support certificates where the common
>    name (CN) for both the WTP and AC is the MAC address of that 
> device.
>    The MAC address MUST be encoded in the PrintableString format, 
> using
>    the well recognized MAC address format of 01:23:45:67:89:ab.  The
>    CN field MAY contain either of the EUI-48 [EUI-48] or EUI-64 
> [EUI-64]
>    MAC Address formats.  This seemingly unconventional use of the CN
>    field is consistent with other standards that rely on device
>    certificates that are provisioned during the manufacturing process,
>    such as Packet Cable [PacketCable], Cable Labs [CableLabs] and 
> WiMAX
>    [WiMAX].
> </proposed text>
History
Date User Action Args
2008-10-09 21:25:09pcalhounlinkissue219 messages
2008-10-09 21:25:09pcalhouncreate