All,

The following was raised during IESG Review:

> Secton 4.6.14:
> 
> "Note that this option is illegal is
>          either the WTP or the AC uses IPv4."
>         
> In addition to the is/if misstake it isn't really illegal but not defined?

Umm... Yes, it is not defined in the CAPWAP spec, and that's what I meant by 
illegal. Since this message element is used to negotiate the data channel, it 
is fair to assume that the control and data channels will use the same IP 
version (v4 vs. v6). Therefore, Ithink we can strengthen the language to:

<proposed text>
4.6.14.  CAPWAP Transport Protocol
[...]
      1 -  UDP-Lite: The UDP-Lite transport protocol is to be used for
         the CAPWAP data channel.  Note that this option MUST NOT be
         used if the CAPWAP control channel is being used over IPv4.
</proposed text>